Another case of identity theft is seen in New Zealand which was reported recently . On March 22nd 2012 , the nzherald writes in its website that a 82 year - old was sentenced at the Auckland District Court to three years and two months of prison . While this case may seem like your regular case of identity theft , the disturbing thing is that Colin Diedrichs , the identity thief , used the identities of dead children to apply for government benefits . It is further written that he had amassed $447,000 over 22 years by getting superannuation benefits in the names of the deceased children . Diedrichs stated in court that he took details of a two year - old boy who had died in 1935 as one of his targets for the theft . From the news we can see that identity theft is unethical as even those who has passed on is not spared from this criminal activity .
In the international arena , there are several different laws that is made to combat identity theft . In Austalia , some states have amended relevant criminal laws to reflect crimes on identity theft , such as the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA), Crimes Amendment (Fraud, Identity and Forgery Offences) Act 2009 and many others . In the philippines , they have a law on cyber crime called the Cybercrim Prevention Act 2010 . Inside the act . section 2 states that violators of the law will be punished by the law through imprisonment or given a fine . The act recognizes the importance of communication and multimedia for the development and dissemination of information .
In the United Kingdom , authorities combat identity theft with the help of the Data Protection Act 1998 . The act covers all personal data which an organization may hold such as names , date of birth , addresses , telephone number and etc . While in America , their side have drafted the Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act . The act provides the Federal Trade Commission with authority to track the numbers of incidents and the dollar value of losses . The statute also makes the possession of any "means of identification" to knowingly transfer , possesses , or use without lawful authority " a federal crime .
Stating down all these laws from different countries , we can see that in the international stage , laws on identity theft is strict and Malaysia should take a look into these laws to further strengthen the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 .
In the international arena , there are several different laws that is made to combat identity theft . In Austalia , some states have amended relevant criminal laws to reflect crimes on identity theft , such as the Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA), Crimes Amendment (Fraud, Identity and Forgery Offences) Act 2009 and many others . In the philippines , they have a law on cyber crime called the Cybercrim Prevention Act 2010 . Inside the act . section 2 states that violators of the law will be punished by the law through imprisonment or given a fine . The act recognizes the importance of communication and multimedia for the development and dissemination of information .
In the United Kingdom , authorities combat identity theft with the help of the Data Protection Act 1998 . The act covers all personal data which an organization may hold such as names , date of birth , addresses , telephone number and etc . While in America , their side have drafted the Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act . The act provides the Federal Trade Commission with authority to track the numbers of incidents and the dollar value of losses . The statute also makes the possession of any "means of identification" to knowingly transfer , possesses , or use without lawful authority " a federal crime .
Stating down all these laws from different countries , we can see that in the international stage , laws on identity theft is strict and Malaysia should take a look into these laws to further strengthen the Personal Data Protection Act 2010 .
No comments:
Post a Comment